Peak Demand in US Electric Sector

Peak Demand in US Electric Sector

Continuing with our analysis from the previous post discussing Peak Energy, we delved into the Peak Demand.  Peak Demand is measured in MW vs. Peak Energy MWa.   Peak demand is typically define as the highest point of energy consumption.  This is very important due to the nature of electricity.  Compared to other commodities, the whole market would not crash for an extended period of time if one could not supply the peak demand point.  However, in the case of electricity this becomes a real problem.  Therefore, much planning is focused on peak demand and figuring alternatives to avoid peaks.  Many commercial and industrial customers can see the bulk of their bill is tied to the peak vs. their average energy consumption.

As we discussed in the previous post, our objective is to produce a forecasting method for our new product, Power Market Analysis (PMA).  Now that we had a very good system in forecasting monthly energy across N. America using GDP and CDD and HDD from various parts of the country, we needed a way to forecast the monthly peaks. The analysis of peak demand differed greatly from the analysis of peak energy.   Applying the same statistical approach used in peak energy was going nowhere.   First, we had to replace the monthly CDD and HDD with weekly maximums given we wanted to forecast peaks not averages.  This improved the analysis.   As expected, given the economic value of reducing peak vs. energy efficiency we saw many more regions decouple from economic growth in establishing peaks.  We also modified the analysis to look at the relationship between average energy and peak demand.   This method established a range for expected peaks in both a normal expectation of weather to extreme cases of weather variations within a month.

Counter to many who are have been alarmed at peak demand growing faster than energy, our analysis leads us to forecast a much slower growth in peak vs. energy.  This is supported by the economic incentives to reduce peak demand is far greater than reducing energy consumption.   In addition, measurement and validation of the various programs to mitigate peak demand is much more “accurate” than energy efficiency programs.

Power Market Analysis (PMA) will allow subscribers a very good view of the power markets and their relationship to the Coal and Gas markets.  One of our goals is to increase the fundamental understanding of the market.   We will issue monthly studies to our subscribers.  The inputs will be clearly displayed for both the base and the extreme cases.   Subscribers will also be able to customize runs.  There is a large incentive for early bird subscribers.  Please do reach out to me ASAP if you are interested in signing up to PMA (614-356-0484 [email protected] ).   We will send a sample file you can expect from PMA.  The official product launch likely in the later part of February.  Besides a financial discount early birds will also be able to guide the product development of PMA and be able to get “free” reports while we finalize the product.   We are building PMA to allow the evolution of the product.  Our current long-term vision could have users having the ability to submit input changes and output be generated for them overnight.

Your Enthused Energy Consultant,

David K. Bellman

614-356-0484

Twitter: AECDKB

 

Refining Outlook Refined for 2014

Refining Outlook Refined for 2014

As I review my last year’s thoughts on refining with updated data, it has caused me to be more bullish on the outlook for refining – which historically is very hard to do.   US refining may be entering another golden age – or perhaps it never left, but just took a nap.   There will be refiners who benefit more than others.   However, the overall market should see additional boost.

What is new or more reaffirming from last year’s review:

  • Continued liquids production from the shale plays.
  • Crude imports are coming whether we like it or not by rail or by pipeline.
  • Continued growth in developing countries.

Shale Play

Shale production continues to beat expectations.   I researched over a dozen papers reviewing and analyzing shale decline curves and initial production rates.   The amazing outcome is not the technology acceleration, but the ability to learn to use and adapt existing technology is accelerating.   Each shale play is unique with an initial set of known.   Applying the techniques done in one play to another play generally does not optimize the production.  The ability to be creative with the tools and resources available has clearly shown an increase in production.   Data is available showing initial production rates to decline curves are improving at wells within existing plays.  In addition, the newer plays are seeing even a more accelerated path of improvements than the Bakken.

It is our belief, this will continue leading to more oil production in the US.  And this oil production is of the sweet and light crude oil.   This very fact is causing the US producers to want to lift the ban on exporting crude oil from the US.  As discussed in my previous refining outlook discussion, the US refiners outsmarted themselves and built the wrong refining configuration.  All is not lost; they just don’t value the sweet crude as much as the outside world might.  At some discount, the oil will be processed and changes will be made in the US refining complex.  This discount is driving producers mad and so the hope is with the ability to export. They could find better buyers across the ocean.   In the meantime, without the lift in crude oil exports, we should continue to see a feedstock price discount to several refiners.   This will cause a drop in finished product prices in the US for the consumer.  However, I anticipate the drop in finished product prices to not be as low as the drop in feedstock prices given the export outlet for finished products.

Crude Imports

Crude imports are coming no matter what you are hearing about the Keystone pipeline issue.   The Keystone pipeline encompasses a greater plan which is shown on this website.   The project is actually three parts with 2 of three pushing forward as the main Keystone Pipeline still is being debated.   Right now,  we have 180,000 barrels/day of crude oil moving by rail from Canada to the US.  The debate perhaps is really the rail industry supporting the ban on Keystone, because the oil will come, it’s really just how you want it to come here, assuming we still want to maintain free trade with our Canadian friends.  This crude oil is more to the liking of the US refining sector.  I suspect logic will prevail and the pipeline will move forward and pressure on the US crude oil markets relative to the foreign markets will maintain itself.   The forward curve as of 02/06/14 continues to show a very stout spread between Brent – WTI of $14/bbl.   Overtime,  I suspect that to come back down to perhaps the $5/bbl range.  However, I think gone is the convention that on annual basis they will trade in parity.

Non-OECD Oil Demand Growth

Over the last 8 years the OECD region demand dropped nearly 5 million b/d.  The US represented nearly half of this drop with half of that drop coming from the push on alternatives fuels mainly ethanol.  Ethanol production now stands at 0.9 million b/d.   Biodiesel adds another 0.1 million b/d.  Even though much is talked about renewable in the power space that  there is now significant volumes to be discusses in the petroleum space.  As I indicated in the power space reaching a peak consumption one can conclude the same in the oil space for US consumers.

With the entire demand decline in OECD region, one would think prices should have declined versus rising 70% in the US gasoline markets.   However, Non-OECD demand grew 9.7 million b/d over that same time period OECD was declining.  There is so much more room to grow for non-OECD region.   BP shows a graphical view of oil consumption per capita across the world.  Even though the US observed a great drop in demand there is still a large gap between the US and the majority of the world.

With those three outlooks solidified, I am optimistic on US refining.   Within the sector, there will be winners and losers.   I can help the refining sector by offering crude oil evaluation to strategic planning to optimize the above concerns.   A fundamental view of crude oil prices and refined products are available.

By the way I do have an opportunity for those interested in a 80,000 bpd condensate refinery in the Caribbean.  A detailed cost study along with an economic analysis was done showing an investment need of around $600 million producing 20+% IRR.   To build a brand new refinery of this scale would be around $1.2-$1.8 Billion.  Please contact me if there is interest in this investment.

Your Continually Refining Energy Consultant,

David K. Bellman

Peak Energy – Are we there in the US?

Peak Energy – Are we there in the US?

Peak energy can be related to many things from Peak Demand, Peak Oil, etc…   Let me clarify my discussion.   Peak energy in my context is the electric energy being consumed by the end user each hour and averaged.   Therefore, the unit of peak energy is Megawatt Average (MWa).   This is much different than the peak demand Megawatt (MW) which occurs in one hour.

I am writing about this topic as I have just analyzed 118 Load Zones across the N. American continent.   Statistical analysis was done on those areas incorporating 26 variables, which included 9 weather zones  (CDD & HDD) and 8 economic regions starting with data back to 2009.  This was an arduous and complex task as each individual zone needed its own menu of variables to optimize the analysis.  AEC is about to launch a new online product – Power Market Analysis (PMA).  PMA will be an online product with annual subscription access to power prices projections across the country and fuel consumption forecast of coal and gas in the power sector for the next two years – More information on PMA to come.  Load represents a fundamental input in analyzing the power markets, so the task had to be done.

The results of the analysis are very eye opening.  The R squared (indication of how well data points fits to the variables analyzed with – ranges from 0 to 1, poor to perfect fit) across all 118 load zones averaged 0.92.  There were several regions which have now begun to decouple from GDP.  The economic well-being of several regions is no longer driving the growth of power.   At this point, I can hear grumblings and concerns at investor held utilities since the load growth is the main mechanism on shareholder returns.  Don’t stop reading, it’s not all gloom or doom for all utilities.   There are two main reasons for this decoupling of GDP.   First is the increase spending in Demand Side Management programs across the country to a tune of $9 Billion.  Second, we may have reached a peak point in energy consumption per capita.   As you look around, how many more devices can you obtain?  Each new device is incorporating better and improved efficiency.  At some point, we will hit a limit to the energy consumption each of us can do.   We are clearly seeing this in this analysis in certain large metropolitan areas when you strip out the weather component.   However. I am only seeing this in certain regions.

The EIA put out a briefing on March 22, 2013 alluding to this.  The graph below does not seem to be weather normalized.  This can lead to a skew vision of what has gone on recently.

Weather has been a large factor over the recent years.   If you look at the GDP from 2010 to 2013 the growth is close to 4%/yr.   If you look at electricity consumption without normalized weather the picture will show an annual decline of 1%/yr.   However, if you strip out the weather component, the load growth is closer to 2.3%/yr.  2010 was an extremely warm year with cooling degree days across the country 21% greater than a normal year.

Weather variations will lead to consumption change as we have become quite temperate in our ability to adapt to various climates.  The weather piece will need to be stripped out of the discussion when it concerns understanding the relationship between power consumption and the economy.  Peak energy discussions cannot include a conclusion on the basis of extreme weather events.  Based on our analysis we still project a rather robust growth in power consumption of 1.9%/yr for N. America based on normal weather and GDP growth around 3%.   Areas that are seeing significant growth are related to the Oil & Gas areas such as Texas, Alberta, Louisiana, and even pockets in the Midwest with shale development.

PMA will offer a daily view of the next two years with three different scenarios – base, high power price, and low power price.   The changes between the cases will be weather, GDP, and gas prices.  In addition subscribers to PMA will be presented monthly with scenario and sensitivities which delve into the greater market dynamics seen in the power space.   PMA will be valuable to those in the Oil & Gas, Coal, and Power industry.   For the Oil, Gas, and Coal companies the focus will be on better understanding on fuel consumption in the power sector.   The power industry the fuel and power prices will be available.   In terms of functions within an organization, expect value to be given to Trading, Fundamentals, Budgeting, Fuel Contracts, and Policy groups.

There is more to come on PMA as we expect a product launch sometime in February.

Your Tireless Analyzing Energy Consultant,

David K. Bellman

614-356-0484

Twitter: AECDKB